In late October 2024, an oil spill occurred during bunkering operations at Singapore’s Changi port, resulting in the release of approximately five tonnes of bunker fuel into the surrounding waters. The incident took place when oil overflowed from the Bahamas-flagged bulk carrier Ines Corrado while refuelling, prompting an immediate halt to operations. The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) responded by deploying dispersants and other containment measures to mitigate the environmental impact. Malaysian authorities were also notified to monitor for any oil drift across maritime boundaries. Fortunately, initial reports indicated no significant navigational disruptions or evidence of oil slicks reaching nearby shorelines.
This spill has raised complex legal challenges concerning liability, compensation, and international jurisdiction. Given Singapore’s position as a major global shipping hub, any environmental incident here triggers strict regulatory scrutiny under national and international maritime law. Liability may extend to multiple parties involved, including the ship owner, the refuelling company, and potentially the crew responsible for oversight. Singapore’s stringent laws require prompt reporting and full cooperation with MPA investigations. If negligence is established, the liable party could face substantial fines or even suspensions.
In cases like this, compensation for environmental damage and response costs often involves multiple jurisdictions, as the spill affects not only Singaporean waters but potentially neighbouring areas. Singapore’s adherence to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage means that compensation claims can be pursued if the responsible vessel’s insurers are held liable. Still, claims processing can be prolonged, especially if liability is contested or if there are disputes over the extent of the environmental impact. Additionally, affected third parties, such as local fisheries and tourism businesses, might seek damages if they suffer economic harm from the incident.
The spill underscores ongoing environmental and legal challenges in Singapore’s maritime sector, highlighting the need for improved safety protocols and stronger enforcement mechanisms to prevent similar occurrences. As Singapore strives to uphold its reputation as an environmentally responsible port, this incident may prompt regulatory reforms focused on enhancing operational safeguards and tightening accountability in bunkering operations.
Marex Media